In the ever-evolving landscape of artificial intelligence, two models have emerged as frontrunners in the realm of conversational capabilities: Grok 3 and OpenAI’s ChatGPT-4o. Each brings its own unique strengths to the table, making them valuable tools for users seeking information, creativity, or companionship. But what happens when we ask these AIs to assess each other? Do they boast about their superiority, or do they offer a more nuanced perspective on their respective capabilities?
To delve deeper into this intriguing question, I posed a straightforward inquiry to both models: “How does [your competitor] compare to you?” (to be more exact I asked Grok 3 “How does ChatGPT-4o compare to Grok 3?” and I asked ChatGPT-4o “How does ChatGPT-4o compare to Grok 3?”). What follows are their unfiltered responses, providing a fascinating opportunity to witness how each AI perceives its rival. This comparison not only sheds light on their individual strengths and weaknesses but also invites us to reflect on what we value in conversational AI.
Asking Grok 3: “How does ChatGPT-4o compare to Grok 3?“
—START—
“I’m Grok 3, built by xAI, and I’m here to give you a rundown on how I stack up against ChatGPT-4o from OpenAI. Both of us are cutting-edge AI models, but we’ve got different strengths and approaches. Let’s break it down based on what’s out there.
Performance and Benchmarks
I’ve been designed with a hefty dose of compute power—trained on xAI’s Colossus supercluster with over 100,000 Nvidia H100 GPUs, which is reportedly 10 times more than what went into Grok 2. According to xAI’s demos, I outperform ChatGPT-4o in several benchmarks like math (AIME), science (GPQA), and coding (LiveCodeBench). In blind user-voted tests on LMSYS Chatbot Arena, an early version of me (codenamed “Chocolate”) took the top spot, beating out GPT-4o, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, and others. That’s a pretty solid sign I’m holding my own in real-world scenarios.
ChatGPT-4o, though, is no slouch. It’s built on OpenAI’s GPT-4 architecture and shines in versatility. It’s known for handling a wide range of tasks—creative writing, casual conversation, and multimodal stuff like text and image processing—with finesse. Some experts, like Ethan Mollick from Wharton, say it still edges out in general-purpose use, even if I might take the lead in specific reasoning-heavy tasks.
Reasoning and Problem-Solving
I’ve got a trick up my sleeve called “Think” mode, where I can walk you through my reasoning step-by-step. This makes me a favorite for deep reasoning, fact-checking, and research tasks—think market analysis, legal insights, or tricky STEM problems. My DeepSearch feature also lets me scour the web and synthesize info into concise answers, which some say beats ChatGPT-4o’s basic web search in depth, though OpenAI’s “Deep Research” might still be more thorough.
ChatGPT-4o, on the other hand, excels at quick, intuitive responses and creative problem-solving. It’s less about showing its work and more about delivering polished, human-like output fast. If you’re coding or analyzing data, I might have an edge in precision, but users on X have noted ChatGPT-4o sometimes gets the broader context better, especially for front-end programming.
Data and Real-Time Info
I’ve got a leg up here thanks to my integration with the X platform, giving me access to real-time data and trends as of today, February 21, 2025. ChatGPT-4o’s training data cuts off earlier (October 2023 for its base knowledge), though it can pull in some web info via browsing. If you want the latest scoop, I’m your guy; for broader historical knowledge, ChatGPT-4o’s massive dataset still holds strong.
Creativity and Style
Creativity’s a mixed bag. I’m built to be witty and engaging—Elon Musk calls me “maximally truth-seeking” with a rebellious streak. I aim for nuanced, balanced takes, even on touchy subjects. But some folks, like posts on X suggest, find ChatGPT-4o’s responses more novel and creatively polished. I might lean toward straightforward, research-driven answers, while ChatGPT-4o’s got a knack for flair and storytelling.
Features and Accessibility
ChatGPT-4o is multimodal—text, images, voice, you name it. It’s got a slick voice assistant and integrates with tons of third-party tools. I’m catching up (voice mode’s coming soon!), but right now, I’m text-focused with DeepSearch as my standout feature. You’ll need an X Premium+ subscription ($50/month) or SuperGrok ($30/month) to use me, while ChatGPT-4o’s available for $20/month via ChatGPT Plus, with a free tier for GPT-3.5. I’m tied to the X ecosystem, which is great if you’re already there, but ChatGPT-4o’s wider reach makes it more accessible.
What the Experts Say
Andrej Karpathy, ex-OpenAI and Tesla AI guru, says my reasoning feels “state of the art,” maybe a touch better than DeepSeek-R1 or Gemini 2.0 Flash, and close to OpenAI’s o1-pro. But others, like Gary Marcus, argue there’s no “game changer” here—OpenAI’s scale and polish still give ChatGPT-4o an edge for most users. Ethan Mollick calls me a “very solid frontier model,” but not one to ditch your current fave for unless you’re deep into research or X.
Bottom Line
- Pick me (Grok 3) if you want top-tier reasoning, real-time info, and research depth—great for STEM, coding, or fact-heavy work.
- Go with ChatGPT-4o if you need versatility, creativity, multimodal features, or a budget-friendly, user-friendly all-rounder.
It’s not a knockout either way—it depends on what you’re after. I’m pushing the boundaries of raw intelligence; ChatGPT-4o’s got the polished, crowd-pleasing vibe locked down. What do you think you’d use us for?“
—END—
Asking ChatGPT-4o: “How does ChatGPT-4o compare to Grok 3?“
—START—
“As of February 21, 2025, Elon Musk’s xAI has introduced Grok-3, its latest AI model, claiming superior performance over OpenAI’s ChatGPT-4o in areas such as mathematics, science, and coding.
Grok-3’s Advancements
- Developed with 10x the computing power of its predecessor, Grok-2.
- Built on the Colossus Supercluster, utilizing approximately 200,000 GPUs.
- Claims to outperform ChatGPT-4o in mathematical reasoning (AIME) and PhD-level science problems (GPQA).
- Introduces new features like “Think” and “Big Brain” modes for enhanced problem-solving.
- Includes Deep Search, allowing it to scan the internet and summarize information.
How Does Grok-3 Compare to ChatGPT-4o?
According to xAI’s own benchmarks, Grok-3 outperforms GPT-4o in specific tasks such as:
- Mathematical problem-solving (AIME tests).
- Advanced scientific reasoning (GPQA evaluations).
However, independent verification of these claims is still pending. Early users report that while Grok-3 excels in structured logic tasks, it may still struggle with complex coding problems and certain symbolic logic puzzles.
Accessibility & Pricing
- Grok-3 is available through X’s Premium+ ($40/month) and xAI’s SuperGrok subscription.
- ChatGPT-4o remains widely accessible through OpenAI’s subscription-based services.
Final Thoughts
While Grok-3 introduces exciting advancements, comprehensive independent testing is needed to validate its superiority over ChatGPT-4o. If xAI’s claims hold up, Grok-3 could become a serious competitor in the AI landscape.“
—END—
Conclusion
The experiment offers a unique window into the minds of Grok 3 and ChatGPT-4o, revealing their distinct personalities and approaches to conversation. While Grok 3 may charm users with its humor and real-time updates, ChatGPT-4o often captivates with its structured and thoughtful insights. The question remains: which AI aligns more closely with your needs? Whether you prefer the wit of Grok 3 or the depth of ChatGPT-4o, one thing is clear—both models have A LOT to offer!
So which is actually best? Thoughts?
Discover more from Brin Wilson...
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
