What if Bitcoin—the original “unstoppable” digital money—ends up being stopped, not by failure, but by success? Not its own success, but the success of what comes next: the slick, centralized, easy-to-use digital stablecoin-CBDC currencies it inspired.
It wouldn’t be the first time this happened.
BitTorrent revolutionized the way people shared music and media. It broke the system, defied the rules, and made decentralization real. But it didn’t win. Instead, it forced the world to build something better for the mainstream: iTunes, Spotify, and streaming services that gave people what they really wanted—convenience.
Bitcoin may be walking the same path.
The BitTorrent Revolution
BitTorrent was the ultimate peer-to-peer file-sharing protocol. It didn’t rely on a central server. It let millions of users share music, videos, and software directly with one another, in a way that couldn’t easily be shut down. It was unstoppable—but it was also inconvenient. Clunky interfaces, sketchy sources, slow downloads, and no way to pay artists.
The music industry panicked. Lawsuits flew. Napster died. But BitTorrent persisted in the shadows. And then, something unexpected happened: Apple launched iTunes. Spotify followed. Suddenly, people could get any song they wanted instantly, legally, and conveniently—with a better user experience than piracy ever offered.
The world shifted. The masses didn’t want freedom; they wanted ease. And so BitTorrent faded into near irrelevance. It had forced open the future, only to make itself obsolete.
Bitcoin: The BitTorrent of Money
Enter Bitcoin. Like BitTorrent, it came out of nowhere. No company, no government, no central server. Just code and math. It promised peer-to-peer digital money—permissionless, trustless, borderless. A system where no bank or government could freeze your account or inflate your currency.
It was revolutionary. But also, like BitTorrent, clunky. Hard to use. Volatile in price. Not scalable for everyday purchases. And like early file-sharing, it attracted shady activity, drawing attention from regulators and skeptics alike.
Still, it planted a seed. It proved digital, decentralized money was possible.
The Rise of the Stablecoin and CBDC
Today, we may be watching Bitcoin’s iTunes moment unfold.
Stablecoins like USDC and USDT offer many of the benefits of crypto with none of the volatility. Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) are being tested and rolled out around the world. They promise fast, programmable, traceable money—controlled by governments, backed by fiat, and seamlessly integrated into national financial systems.
These are polished, convenient, and familiar. They may never have existed without Bitcoin—but they may also make Bitcoin feel completely unnecessary for most people.
Here’s where the irony deepens: The movement that began with a cypherpunk dream to liberate money from centralized control may end up ushering in the most tightly controlled, surveilled form of money the world has ever seen.
Stablecoin-CBDCs could allow governments to monitor every transaction in real time, restrict spending by category or geography, or freeze accounts at the push of a button. It’s programmable money—not for freedom, but for compliance. The very opposite of what Bitcoin set out to enable.
The Paradox of Disruption
BitTorrent showed us that decentralization could work, but was too raw for mass adoption. Spotify capitalized on its wake. Bitcoin showed that money could be unbound from the state, but the masses may prefer digital cash with a help desk.
And here’s another key parallel: learning how to use BitTorrent was a turn-off to most people. It required time, technical understanding, a willingness to hunt down files and manage downloads—not something the average person with a busy life wanted to deal with. With Bitcoin, the barrier is even higher. It’s not just complex to use—it’s complex to even understand. Wallets, keys, seed phrases, blockchain mechanics, transaction fees, and worst of all: irreversible mistakes. And unlike with BitTorrent, where the stakes were just a music file or movie, with Bitcoin the stakes are your hard-earned actual money. There’s trust, volatility, and very real financial risk involved.
In the end, people tend to choose convenience, confidence, and simplicity—even if it comes at the cost of freedom.
The question now is: will Bitcoin fade like BitTorrent? Will it become a relic that forced open a new era, only to be cast aside for something more convenient—and more controlled?
Or will it endure as a parallel system? A decentralized check on the creeping control of state money? A kind of digital gold that quietly resists, even as the mainstream opts into centralized digital cash?
Either way, its place in history is secure. Just as BitTorrent forced open the gates of a new music economy, Bitcoin may be remembered not for becoming the future of money, but for making it inevitable—and for warning us what that future could become.
Discover more from Brin Wilson...
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
