Every month, the U.S. Treasury releases data showing who holds its debt. At the top of the list are familiar names: Japan, China, the United Kingdom, Luxembourg, Ireland, Switzerland.
Some of these countries are export powerhouses. Others are global financial centers. A few run persistent trade deficits. Yet all of them buy—and hold—massive amounts of U.S. government bonds.
Why?
The standard explanation is simple: countries that run trade surpluses with the United States accumulate dollars and recycle them into U.S. Treasuries. It’s safe, liquid, and earns some interest. But that explanation doesn’t tell the full story.
In fact, many of the biggest holders of U.S. debt don’t have large trade surpluses at all. Some even run deficits. Yet they still buy Treasuries in enormous volumes.
What explains this behavior?
There’s no single answer. But when you examine the data and the broader system these countries operate within, a picture begins to emerge—one that touches on economics, finance, and geopolitics. Some of the conclusions are speculative. But taken together, they offer a compelling way of understanding how and why the world supports the U.S. financial system—even when the math doesn’t quite add up.
The Trade Surplus Narrative (and Where It Falls Short)
It’s true that countries with large trade surpluses—especially with the U.S.—often end up buying Treasuries. This is what China did for decades: exporting goods, earning dollars, and parking many of those dollars in U.S. government bonds. This “vendor finance” model helps keep their own currencies competitive and their export engines humming.
But it doesn’t explain why countries like:
- Japan, with only a modest trade surplus,
- The UK, which runs a substantial trade deficit,
- Or Luxembourg and Cayman Islands, whose economies are tiny relative to their holdings…
…still hold tens or even hundreds of billions in U.S. debt.
To make sense of this, we need to widen the lens.
Beyond Trade: What Else Drives Treasury Holdings?
Let’s consider some other possible—and plausible—factors. These are not certainties, but they help form a working theory for why many countries and regions participate so heavily in the U.S. bond market, even without obvious economic incentives.
1. Integration into the Dollar-Based Financial System
Many countries, especially advanced economies and financial hubs, are deeply embedded in the global dollar system. Their banks, insurers, asset managers, and corporations operate in markets where the dollar is the standard unit of account, medium of exchange, and store of value.
In this system, U.S. Treasuries are foundational:
- They’re used as collateral in global lending markets.
- They’re the safest, most liquid assets in the world.
- They serve as benchmarks for pricing risk everywhere else.
So even without a trade surplus, there are institutional, structural reasons why entities within these countries hold Treasuries. It’s simply how global finance works.
2. Financial Intermediation and Offshore Booking
Some of the largest holders of U.S. debt are not traditional nation-states in the classic sense, but offshore financial centers or tax-advantaged jurisdictions. The Cayman Islands and Luxembourg are examples.
These are not countries buying debt for strategic reserves—they’re intermediaries. Global investors (hedge funds, asset managers, multinationals) route capital through them for legal or financial efficiency. When those funds buy Treasuries, they’re often recorded under the name of the jurisdiction—not the ultimate owner.
Similarly, the UK—particularly London—is a major hub for global capital markets. A significant portion of the Treasuries “held by the UK” likely reflect activity by non-British investors using UK-based institutions.
3. Reserve Holdings for Currency and Market Stability
Countries also hold Treasuries as part of their foreign exchange reserves, even without large trade surpluses. Holding dollars allows them to:
- Intervene in currency markets if needed
- Backstop their domestic financial systems
- Maintain confidence during periods of instability
In this sense, Treasuries are a form of insurance—not just an investment.
4. Geopolitical Alignment and Strategic Dependency
This is where things become more speculative—but potentially very real.
Some analysts argue that countries like Japan and many U.S. allies in Europe buy Treasuries not just because it’s economically useful—but because it’s strategically expected.
Japan, for instance, holds over $1 trillion in U.S. debt—far more than its trade surplus would explain. As a country heavily reliant on U.S. military protection, technology access, and diplomatic cover, its financial choices are not entirely independent. Buying Treasuries may be part of a broader understanding—an unspoken agreement that supports continued access to U.S. power, markets, and security.
This theory isn’t provable in any strict sense. But history shows that countries deeply reliant on American protection often support the system that underwrites it. Financial loyalty becomes part of geopolitical alignment.
5. There Are No Better Options
Finally, we can’t ignore the practical reality: there just aren’t that many viable alternatives to U.S. Treasuries.
- Eurozone bonds are fragmented and politically fragile.
- Chinese bonds are opaque and not freely convertible.
- Gold is illiquid and pays no interest.
- Other markets are too small to absorb hundreds of billions.
So even if a country isn’t perfectly positioned to buy Treasuries, it may do so because nothing else offers the same combination of liquidity, safety, and universality.
What the Numbers Are Really Telling Us
If you compare U.S. Treasury holdings to trade balances, you find an inconsistent pattern:
- Some countries hold debt in proportion to their surpluses.
- Others hold far more than their economic activity would justify.
- Still others act as pass-through entities for global capital.
The deeper truth is this: U.S. Treasuries are not just an economic asset. They are a cornerstone of global order.
Holding them does more than earn a return. It buys access, credibility, stability—and sometimes influence.
Conclusion: A System Bigger Than Economics
There is no single reason why so many countries hold U.S. debt. In some cases, it’s trade-driven. In others, it’s financial or strategic. And in many cases, it’s simply because they are part of a global system that revolves around the U.S. dollar and U.S. power.
Theories about strategic obligation or systemic dependence may be speculative—but they are not unreasonable. The global financial order is not just built on spreadsheets. It’s built on relationships, interests, and quiet understandings.
In that context, holding U.S. Treasuries isn’t just a financial decision.
It’s a way of participating in the world as it is.
Discover more from Brin Wilson...
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
